Sunday, February 04, 2007
Deal or No Deal
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a1304/a130415e69313b689fa1bf6d3d9a4646d0788d97" alt=""
Seems amicable, right?
Well, it seems Jim spoke out of turn:
"I note from news accounts of my husband's filing that he claims we have reached a comprehensive agreement. That is not true," Matos McGreevey said through her lawyer, John N. Post. "We continue to have profound differences about what our daughter should be exposed to, and until they are resolved, there will be no agreement."
The "[w]hat our daughter should be exposed to" bit seemed a little odd. What is Dina afraid the kid will be exposed to? Two gay men? Yikes, not that!
Alternatively, maybe Dina just wants to drag this out until her book, The Silent Partner, is released in May. We won't lie -- we're hoping that she tells some dirty little secrets that Jim left out of his snoozer of a book.
Labels: Dina Matos McGreevey, divorce, Jim McGreevey, New Jersey